Method Injection in DI: How to Shoot Yourself in the Foot!
Dependency injection (DI) is a powerful technique that allows you to write flexible, scalable code. One of its key features is method injection - the ability to pass dependencies to methods directly rather than through constructor injection.
But beware! This feature can be dangerous if used incorrectly. Here’s what you need to know:
So What Is The Problem with Method Injection?
Method injection can make your code more complex and harder to test. If you’re not careful, it can lead to tightly-coupled code that’s difficult to maintain.
One common mistake is to use method injection excessively, resulting in “hidden” dependencies that are hard to track down. Always remember: just because you can inject a dependency into a method doesn’t mean you should.
Second! It can lead to unnecessary object creation. When you inject a dependency into a method, you may end up creating a new instance of that object every time the method is called. This can be particularly problematic for expensive or resource-intensive objects.
What Is A Better Way? ➡️ Constructor Injection
Oh, you want to learn about Constructor Injection? How bold of you! Well, look no further - I have all the juicy details waiting for you on my blog. Ready or not, here comes the knowledge! ;)
However, there are cases where method injection still makes sense. For example, if you have a single method that requires a specific dependency, it may be more appropriate to inject that dependency directly.
Example
Let’s say we have a UserService
class that requires a UserRepository
dependency. Rather than injecting the repository through the constructor, we’ll use method injection to inject it directly into our getUserById
method:
|
|
Notice that we also inject a logger dependency into the constructor using the more traditional constructor injection.
P.S. when it comes to DI, method injection is like a gun - it can be quite dangerous if not handled carefully. ;-) cheeers. 🍺